+ Reply to Thread
Page 5 of 82 FirstFirst ... 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 15 55 ... LastLast
Results 201 to 250 of 4083

Thread: Red Sox Thread Version 5.0

  1. #201
    Hello dum-dum... effdamets's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    Now in Section 419
    Posts
    13,811

    Re: Red Sox Thread Version 5.0

    Quote Originally Posted by Nathan
    The six hits off Joba and Mo had nothing to do with it? I agree that Rivera's runs were unearned, but he still could have gotten out of it. He's the Best Ever.
    Whatever...
    Keep living in your fantasy sandbox...
    To seek the sacred river Alph, To walk the caves of ice
    To break my fast on honey dew, And drink the milk of paradise

  2. #202

    Re: Red Sox Thread Version 5.0

    Quote Originally Posted by Nathan
    Yes, it was sarcasm. It has nothing to do with being a troll.

    Sure, the game wasn't 100% positive for the Red Sox, but the outcome was.
    It wasn't. According to you just yesterday a victory doesn't count if it's a case of the losing team simply underperforming. The Yankees win that game if their players simply perform better. You feel awful about the whole thing, thus your angry posts today. You're not fooling anyone.

  3. #203

    Re: Red Sox Thread Version 5.0

    Quote Originally Posted by Nathan
    Who can say with a straight face that the Red Sox shouldn't be happy about overcoming a 5-1 deficit against Joba and Rivera? Were you guys unhappy about beating Papelbon 2 days ago because you barely won? That post deserved sarcasm.
    You should be happy about winning, but a dropped popup and poor defensive alignment and almost second consecutive blown save isn't enough to herald it as a "turning point", "perfect comeback", or "redemption".

    Also, getting 2 HRs and 4 RBIs off your closer isn't barely winning. It's driving a stake through the heart.
    Stella said, "Daddy when you gonna put me in a song?"

    (Visit the companion site to NYYFans! It's more than meets the eye: The new Political Soapbox)

  4. #204
    Better than you teknetic's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    18,875

    Re: Red Sox Thread Version 5.0

    Quote Originally Posted by Nathan
    He's the Best Ever.
    Right, he also isn't 0-5 with an ERA north of 10 against his teams' arch rivals.
    Tiger Woods:Sent: 01:28 PM 09/08/2009:
    Have you ever had a golden shower done to you

  5. #205

    Re: Red Sox Thread Version 5.0

    Quote Originally Posted by President Kennedy
    It wasn't. According to you just yesterday a victory doesn't count if it's a case of the losing team simply underperforming. The Yankees win that game if their players simply perform better. You feel awful about the whole thing, thus your angry posts today. You're not fooling anyone.
    I said it doesn't count? Link?

    It's true that Beckett's performance was discouraging and they fell into another hole. If Joba and Rivera had done their jobs (Rivera arguably did, sort of, but he didn't pick up his team after the error either), the Yankees would have won.

  6. #206

    Re: Red Sox Thread Version 5.0

    Quote Originally Posted by Nathan
    I said it doesn't count? Link?

    It's true that Beckett's performance was discouraging and they fell into another hole. If Joba and Rivera had done their jobs (Rivera arguably did, sort of, but he didn't pick up his team after the error either), the Yankees would have won.
    I'm glad there are worthwhile Sox fans here to pick up the error you are.

  7. #207

    Re: Red Sox Thread Version 5.0

    Quote Originally Posted by NYYDragoon
    You should be happy about winning, but a dropped popup and poor defensive alignment and almost second consecutive blown save isn't enough to herald it as a "turning point", "perfect comeback", or "redemption".
    I don't remember using those terms. But I'll take the perfect comeback one, at least almost perfect. Papelbon blows a save and the game, then the MoJob crew blows a game the next night. Seems pretty equal. Papelbon had an error happen to him in the 9th, too. He (barely) got out of it anyway.

    Also, getting 2 HRs and 4 RBIs off your closer isn't barely winning. It's driving a stake through the heart.
    For the night, sure. But I guess a team's broken heart can mend pretty quickly. Witness last night.

    Of course, the Red Sox still have a huge hole to dig out of so they remain in a difficult position.

  8. #208
    time of my life... b-ball-lunachick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    34,868

    Re: Red Sox Thread Version 5.0

    Quote Originally Posted by wwjdd
    It is odd but I wouldn't read too much into it. Maybe VM (who strikes me as a pretty good guy) thought that, given how the Yanks have owned the Sox, it would be natural for Cervelli to assume that the Sox might be trying to fire up the team by hitting a batter.
    I think it might also have to do with Victor knowing that he's not super popular over there -- not sure if it's his enthusiasm or why Beckett in particular seems to bark at him once a game.

    I do think Victor seems like a pretty good guy..and don't take this the wrong way, but I almost feel bad for him being on that team with the chemistry or lack thereof...

    Quote Originally Posted by TommyK8
    I can't even imagine how crazy these threads would have been if Nathan had been around when the Red Sox really were a much better team.
    I agree..although who knows - maybe he was?

  9. #209

    Re: Red Sox Thread Version 5.0

    Quote Originally Posted by Nathan
    I said it doesn't count? Link?
    http://forums.nyyfans.com/showpost.p...postcount=7291

  10. #210
    NYYF Legend

    4bronxbombers's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    110 miles from the greatest Stadium on earth / Section 417 Grandstand
    Posts
    51,547

    Re: Red Sox Thread Version 5.0

    Quote Originally Posted by President Kennedy
    We would have probably won if the Sox had only lost.

    Merry f'ing Christmas

  11. #211

    Re: Red Sox Thread Version 5.0

    Maybe I'm not seeing where I said a victory doesn't count if the losing team underperforms. I'll keep looking through that link though!

  12. #212
    Hello dum-dum... effdamets's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    Now in Section 419
    Posts
    13,811

    Re: Red Sox Thread Version 5.0

    Quote Originally Posted by Eschie
    I'm glad there are worthwhile Sox fans here to pick up the error you are.
    Ya know - I once sat around with Sox fans in the stands for about an hour after the Yankees lost a huge game to the Sox... They really changed my mind about their fanbase.... and that for every "good" Sox fan there is a Tooley McToolenstine fan that is grossly delusional.
    To seek the sacred river Alph, To walk the caves of ice
    To break my fast on honey dew, And drink the milk of paradise

  13. #213

    Re: Red Sox Thread Version 5.0

    Quote Originally Posted by Nathan
    I said it doesn't count? Link?

    It's true that Beckett's performance was discouraging and they fell into another hole. If Joba and Rivera had done their jobs (Rivera arguably did, sort of, but he didn't pick up his team after the error either), the Yankees would have won.
    Exactly, so you agree that the Sox didn't really win last night, at least according to the Nathan W/L Theory. I'm guessing this is why your posts are coming across pretty hostile this morning.

  14. #214

    Re: Red Sox Thread Version 5.0

    It's amazing, isn't it?

  15. #215

    Re: Red Sox Thread Version 5.0

    Quote Originally Posted by Nathan
    I guess a team's broken heart can mend pretty quickly. Witness last night.
    Such a drama queen.

    Buck up, Mary, they may have won the game the night before too if they only hadn't lost.

  16. #216

    Re: Red Sox Thread Version 5.0

    Quote Originally Posted by President Kennedy
    Exactly, so you agree that the Sox didn't really win last night, at least according to the Nathan W/L Theory. I'm guessing this is why your posts are coming across pretty hostile this morning.
    I'll need a link to this Theory.

  17. #217

    Re: Red Sox Thread Version 5.0

    Quote Originally Posted by Nathan
    Everyone's in contention in May. Well, maybe not the Orioles.

    No, it's because he's a prominent player on a rival team. Even if he were a buffoon/liar, there are probably 10 more guys on the Red Sox or the Royals or the Dodgers or the Yankees or any other roster that would fit the same description. But you focus on Ortiz for other reasons.
    Because this is the Sox thread and the play happened in last night's game.

    Just because you bring up players other than Red Sox here doesn't mean other people should.

  18. #218
    Released Outright
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Alexandria, VA
    Posts
    1,585

    Re: Red Sox Thread Version 5.0

    Quote Originally Posted by Nathan
    Good pitching beats good hitting the vast majority of the time. You get bloops off of good pitches and guys like Vlad hitting home runs off balls in the dirt once in a blue moon, but despite your attempt at sarcasm, you're actually somewhat correct. Except for the "nothing to do with the Sox" part. If Joba had done his job, the Sox leave NY with their tails between their legs.

    Joba, Thames, and Rivera are the goat trifecta of tonight's game, just like Dice-K and Papelbon were the goats last night.

    Cue everyone arguing with this obvious point in 3...2...
    It was nothing like Dice-BB and Papelblown. Two balls sailing over the fence like they were on rocket boosters are nothing like bloops, drops and bad umpiring. You can't possibly even make that argument.

  19. #219

    Re: Red Sox Thread Version 5.0

    Quote Originally Posted by Miss Yvonne
    Such a drama queen.

    Buck up, Mary, they may have won the game the night before too if they only hadn't lost.
    Drama queen? I was replying to the "stake through the heart" comment from another poster.

    Still riding PK's strawman coattails?

  20. #220

    Re: Red Sox Thread Version 5.0

    Quote Originally Posted by Nathan
    I said it doesn't count? Link?

    It's true that Beckett's performance was discouraging and they fell into another hole. If Joba and Rivera had done their jobs (Rivera arguably did, sort of, but he didn't pick up his team after the error either), the Yankees would have won.
    Its really not about the Yankees. Yanks have plenty of their own concerns, for sure. But I think it will take more than a really ugly loss in which Boston didn't play well at all to be encouraged if you're a level-headed Sox fan. After last's game the Sox are still 8.5 games out of the East and they have 8 games in a row against Minnesota, Philly and Tampa.

    With starters, relievers and defense looking terrible, my point was only that it is a little stupid to use headlines suggesting a step in the right direction.


  21. #221

    Re: Red Sox Thread Version 5.0

    Quote Originally Posted by Nathan
    Drama queen? I was replying to the "stake through the heart" comment from another poster.

    Still riding PK's strawman coattails?
    Oh, Nathan. You're just getting it from all sides, aren't you?

  22. #222

    Re: Red Sox Thread Version 5.0

    Quote Originally Posted by yanke26
    It was nothing like Dice-BB and Papelblown. Two balls sailing over the fence like they were on rocket boosters are nothing like bloops, drops and bad umpiring. You can't possibly even make that argument.
    The Red Sox got 6 hits off of MoJob, and they weren't all bloops. It wasn't all luck.

    If it makes you feel better, ok, the Yankee comeback 2 days ago counted more than the Red Sox last night. I think I'll put on my PK hat and call this the yanke26 Comeback Theory.

  23. #223

    Re: Red Sox Thread Version 5.0

    Quote Originally Posted by Nathan
    Maybe I'm not seeing where I said a victory doesn't count if the losing team underperforms. I'll keep looking through that link though!
    Judging by some of the theories you've posted I wouldn't be the least bit surprised if you were incapable of understanding what you yourself were imputing.

  24. #224

    Re: Red Sox Thread Version 5.0

    Quote Originally Posted by Nathan
    The Red Sox got 6 hits off of MoJob, and they weren't all bloops. It wasn't all luck. .
    MoJob? That's a CS violation, Nathan.

  25. #225

    Re: Red Sox Thread Version 5.0

    Quote Originally Posted by Eschie
    Judging by some of the theories you've posted I wouldn't be the least bit surprised if you were incapable of understanding what you yourself were imputing.
    It's virtually impossible to have a conversation with him. The theories change just about every day, sometimes by the hour. Remember when in the span of just a few posts he wanted to both revel in 2004 and call it a sham?

  26. #226
    time of my life... b-ball-lunachick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    34,868

    Re: Red Sox Thread Version 5.0

    Quote Originally Posted by President Kennedy
    It's virtually impossible to have a conversation with him. The theories change just about every day, sometimes by the hour. Remember when in the span of just a few posts he wanted to both revel in 2004 and call it a sham?
    this is true- although I challenge that it was ever possible...it was just more fun toying with him. now that's not even fun anymore, he's just annoying.

  27. #227
    Released Outright
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Alexandria, VA
    Posts
    1,585

    Re: Red Sox Thread Version 5.0

    Quote Originally Posted by Nathan
    The Red Sox got 6 hits off of MoJob, and they weren't all bloops. It wasn't all luck.

    If it makes you feel better, ok, the Yankee comeback 2 days ago counted more than the Red Sox last night. I think I'll put on my PK hat and call this the yanke26 Comeback Theory.
    They weren't all bloops. One was a horrible error, one was an out at first called safe, one was an outfielder playing way too far in. You're right, they weren't all bloops. Try to tell me they were good solid hits though and you'll have to excuse my laughter.

  28. #228

    Re: Red Sox Thread Version 5.0

    Quote Originally Posted by b-ball-lunachick
    this is true- although I challenge that it was ever possible...it was just more fun toying with him. now that's not even fun anymore, he's just annoying.
    Eh, I don't find him much of anything except confused. I guess he's trying to rile people up but all I ever take away from him is that he's really really angry all the time.

  29. #229

    Re: Red Sox Thread Version 5.0

    I thought it was encouraging that the Sox came back from large deficits two nights in a row and actually came away with the win last night. starting pitching looks terrible, but it was encouraing nonetheless
    Quote Originally Posted by President Kennedy
    Someone once said a man can measure his value by the worth of his enemies. Considering the people who hate me in this thread, I really am a DB.

  30. #230

    Re: Red Sox Thread Version 5.0

    Quote Originally Posted by Eschie
    Judging by some of the theories you've posted I wouldn't be the least bit surprised if you were incapable of understanding what you yourself were imputing.
    So, if Papelbon hadn't blown the game 2 days ago, the Yankees might still have won? Ah, the Eschie Theory. Where wins lie hidden somewhere between saves and blown saves.

    Ok, posting like PK and attributing theories to you that you never posited isn't productive. Less about me, more about baseball please.

    Speaking of V-Mart, if he can get out of his extended slump the lineup will look a lot better. He's down to an OPS of .659, which is almost 200 points lower than his career #s, and he's ideally their #3 hitter. That has got to pick up.

  31. #231
    Better than you teknetic's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    18,875

    Re: Red Sox Thread Version 5.0

    Quote Originally Posted by President Kennedy
    Eh, I don't find him much of anything except confused. I guess he's trying to rile people up but all I ever take away from him is that he's really really angry all the time.
    Is angry and dumb the same thing?
    Tiger Woods:Sent: 01:28 PM 09/08/2009:
    Have you ever had a golden shower done to you

  32. #232
    Please, call me YFiB Yankee Fan in Boston's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Too Close to Fenway
    Posts
    9,860

    Re: Red Sox Thread Version 5.0

    Sorry if this has been discussed already, but is Francona now following a "if we aren't going to sign Papelbon long-term, we might as well run him into the ground" philosophy?
    "Trade a player a year too early rather than a year too late" -- Branch Rickey

  33. #233
    Hello dum-dum... effdamets's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    Now in Section 419
    Posts
    13,811

    Re: Red Sox Thread Version 5.0

    Quote Originally Posted by Ric
    I thought it was encouraging that the Sox came back from large deficits two nights in a row and actually came away with the win last night. starting pitching looks terrible, but it was encouraing nonetheless
    But you HAVE to ask yourself if it is at all possible to score 7 runs every single night....

    Their pitching will do them in this season....
    To seek the sacred river Alph, To walk the caves of ice
    To break my fast on honey dew, And drink the milk of paradise

  34. #234

    Re: Red Sox Thread Version 5.0

    Quote Originally Posted by Miss Yvonne
    MoJob? That's a CS violation, Nathan.
    It is? I remember seeing a thread with that title on here. If it is, I'll change it post haste.

    http://forums.nyyfans.com/showthread...ighlight=mojob

  35. #235
    Better than you teknetic's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    18,875

    Re: Red Sox Thread Version 5.0

    Quote Originally Posted by Nick1985
    is Mo getting old? 2 big blown saves in the past week alone does not have me feeling too comfortable

    hey guys, anyone in here a Knicks fan? Due to how difficult it'll be to get tickets after we get Lebron (which i really think we will), I just bought tickets in Center Court Section 334. But unfortunately I cannot afford them all. The Knicks are only selling full season tickets so it was my only choice.

    If you want to get tickets while you still can, I will sell you 10-25 games of my season ticket package for FACE VALUE ($74 per ticket).

    If interested, please contact me at 845-258-8655 or gocru................@yahoo.com, and let me know how many tickets you'd like. Tickets cost: $74 X the number of tickets X the amount of games you want. We can set-up a payment plan.

    Nick
    Are you trying to outdo Nathan?

    It's not working.
    Tiger Woods:Sent: 01:28 PM 09/08/2009:
    Have you ever had a golden shower done to you

  36. #236

    Re: Red Sox Thread Version 5.0

    Quote Originally Posted by Yankee Fan in Boston
    Sorry if this has been discussed already, but is Francona now following a "if we aren't going to sign Papelbon long-term, we might as well run him into the ground" philosophy?
    No, I'm sure they're not. He'll be unavailable tonight and they'll probably stay away from him 2 or 3 days if they can.

  37. #237

    Re: Red Sox Thread Version 5.0

    Quote Originally Posted by Miss Yvonne
    Oh, Nathan. You're just getting it from all sides, aren't you?
    Like Heidi Watney....

  38. #238

    Re: Red Sox Thread Version 5.0

    Quote Originally Posted by Nathan
    So, if Papelbon hadn't blown the game 2 days ago, the Yankees might still have won? Ah, the Eschie Theory. Where wins lie hidden somewhere between saves and blown saves.
    Quote Originally Posted by Nathan
    If Matsuzaka and Papelbon had pitched well, the Red Sox most likely would have won.
    Who's theory were you trying to rip on?

  39. #239

    Re: Red Sox Thread Version 5.0

    Quote Originally Posted by Nathan

    Less about me, more about baseball please.
    But there's no baseball in your baseball. It's all wild guessing and bizarre alternate reality theories. THen when you're cornered on them, suddenly you pretend to want to discuss Victor Martinez and how crappy he is.

  40. #240

    Re: Red Sox Thread Version 5.0

    Quote Originally Posted by Nick1985
    is Mo getting old? 2 big blown saves in the past week alone does not have me feeling too comfortable

    hey guys, anyone in here a Knicks fan? Due to how difficult it'll be to get tickets after we get Lebron (which i really think we will), I just bought tickets in Center Court Section 334. But unfortunately I cannot afford them all. The Knicks are only selling full season tickets so it was my only choice.

    If you want to get tickets while you still can, I will sell you 10-25 games of my season ticket package for FACE VALUE ($74 per ticket).

    If interested, please contact me at 845-258-8655 or gocru................@yahoo.com, and let me know how many tickets you'd like. Tickets cost: $74 X the number of tickets X the amount of games you want. We can set-up a payment plan.

    Nick
    Nick, let me ask you something, do you think Josh Beckett was really injured last night or was the whole thing a ruse? Plus, V-Mart - can he rebound from his slump?

  41. #241

    Re: Red Sox Thread Version 5.0

    Quote Originally Posted by President Kennedy
    But there's no baseball in your baseball. It's all wild guessing and bizarre alternate reality theories. THen when you're cornered on them, suddenly you pretend to want to discuss Victor Martinez and how crappy he is.
    If Papelbon had pitched well 2 nights ago, the Red Sox would have won. Is that really so bizarre that you should be rolling around on the floor laughing?

    I applied the same logic to last night's game. If Joba/Rivera had pitched better, the Yankees would have won.

    I think you guys are stuck in a Pavlovian pattern of "Nathan just posted! I must argue and tell him he's stupid, no matter what he said!".

  42. #242

    Re: Red Sox Thread Version 5.0

    Quote Originally Posted by Nathan
    So, if Papelbon hadn't blown the game 2 days ago, the Yankees might still have won? Ah, the Eschie Theory. Where wins lie hidden somewhere between saves and blown saves.

    Ok, posting like PK and attributing theories to you that you never posited isn't productive. Less about me, more about baseball please.
    Truly bizarre, Nathan, attempting to insult me by attributing a stupid theory to me that you came up with.

    Most people here think you're a troll but, to your credit, I don't think you're here with bad motives, you're just not that smart.

  43. #243

    Re: Red Sox Thread Version 5.0

    yawn
    "He's done it all now....he's one of the greatest players that's ever played this game.'' - Brian Cashman on Alex.

    2009 = shutting up the haters. Thanks Arod and CC.

  44. #244

    Re: Red Sox Thread Version 5.0

    Quote Originally Posted by Nathan
    If Papelbon had pitched well 2 nights ago, the Red Sox would have won. Is that really so bizarre that you should be rolling around on the floor laughing?

    I applied the same logic to last night's game. If Joba/Rivera had pitched better, the Yankees would have won.

    I think you guys are stuck in a Pavlovian pattern of "Nathan just posted! I must argue and tell him he's stupid, no matter what he said!".
    You mad.

  45. #245

    Re: Red Sox Thread Version 5.0

    Quote Originally Posted by Nathan
    If Papelbon had pitched well 2 nights ago, the Red Sox would have won. Is that really so bizarre that you should be rolling around on the floor laughing?

    I applied the same logic to last night's game. If Joba/Rivera had pitched better, the Yankees would have won.

    I think you guys are stuck in a Pavlovian pattern of "Nathan just posted! I must argue and tell him he's stupid, no matter what he said!".
    You're such a victim here.

    Did you ever stop to think maybe there's a reason people feel this way about you?

  46. #246

    Re: Red Sox Thread Version 5.0

    Quote Originally Posted by Eschie
    Truly bizarre, Nathan, attempting to insult me by attributing a stupid theory to me that you came up with.
    Link?

  47. #247
    Please, call me YFiB Yankee Fan in Boston's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Too Close to Fenway
    Posts
    9,860

    Re: Red Sox Thread Version 5.0

    Quote Originally Posted by Nathan
    If Papelbon had pitched well 2 nights ago, the Red Sox would have won. Is that really so bizarre that you should be rolling around on the floor laughing?

    I applied the same logic to last night's game. If Joba/Rivera had pitched better, the Yankees would have won.

    I think you guys are stuck in a Pavlovian pattern of "Nathan just posted! I must argue and tell him he's stupid, no matter what he said!".
    So what you are saying is, you posted a bunch of ridiculous, nonsensical crap, and now people read your posts and just expect more ridiculous, nonsensical crap?

    Hard to object to that.
    "Trade a player a year too early rather than a year too late" -- Branch Rickey

  48. #248

    Re: Red Sox Thread Version 5.0

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr Coffee
    You're such a victim here.

    Did you ever stop to think maybe there's a reason people feel this way about you?
    I know exactly why they do. Never wondered about that.

  49. #249

    Re: Red Sox Thread Version 5.0

    Quote Originally Posted by Yankee Fan in Boston
    So what you are saying is, you posted a bunch of ridiculous, nonsensical crap, and now people read your posts and just expect more ridiculous, nonsensical crap?

    Hard to object to that.
    That is fantastic.

  50. #250

    Re: Red Sox Thread Version 5.0

    Quote Originally Posted by Yankee Fan in Boston
    So what you are saying is, you posted a bunch of ridiculous, nonsensical crap
    Sigh. Link?

+ Reply to Thread

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts