+ Reply to Thread
Page 4 of 82 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 14 54 ... LastLast
Results 151 to 200 of 4083

Thread: Red Sox Thread Version 5.0

  1. #151

    Re: Red Sox Thread Version 5.0

    Quote Originally Posted by Nathan
    Nice to see that Ortiz is pretty much officially out of The Slump. 2-3, about 2 ft. from another home run tonight, which he would have had were it not for the wind blowing in. Nice to see.
    No, see, good players go through slumps, i.e. they have periods of reduced performance. Ortiz is going through the inverse right now.
    Stella said, "Daddy when you gonna put me in a song?"

    (Visit the companion site to NYYFans! It's more than meets the eye: The new Political Soapbox)

  2. #152

    Re: Red Sox Thread Version 5.0

    Oh, Nathan. You just can't help yourself, can you?

    Sad.

  3. #153

    Re: Red Sox Thread Version 5.0

    Ortiz getting thrown out because he's a lazy, fat, showboating idiot was definitely the play of the game. Since there isn't anything at stake with the Sox not a playoff contender, I'm just going to enjoy that awesome play.

  4. #154

    Re: Red Sox Thread Version 5.0

    Quote Originally Posted by NYYDragoon
    No, see, good players go through slumps, i.e. they have periods of reduced performance. Ortiz is going through the inverse right now.
    Well, that's possible. But the past gives no indication of that being the case. He was a very good hitter between 2003-2008. 2009 started out worse than this year for him, then he led the league in HR from June-Sept. So there aren't any reasons for you to brand him anything other than a "good hitter" (minus the slumps to start the past 2 years) unless you think he's hit the wall age-wise and he's just having one last good month before his career is over.

    Is that what you think?

  5. #155

    Re: Red Sox Thread Version 5.0

    Quote Originally Posted by Miss Yvonne
    Oh, Nathan. You just can't help yourself, can you?

    Sad.
    To what are you referring?

  6. #156

    Re: Red Sox Thread Version 5.0

    Quote Originally Posted by Nathan
    He was a very good hitter between 2003-2008.
    Sure, with a little performance enhancement, right?
    Stella said, "Daddy when you gonna put me in a song?"

    (Visit the companion site to NYYFans! It's more than meets the eye: The new Political Soapbox)

  7. #157

    Re: Red Sox Thread Version 5.0

    Quote Originally Posted by I'm A Wenner!
    Ortiz getting thrown out because he's a lazy, fat, showboating idiot was definitely the play of the game. Since there isn't anything at stake with the Sox not a playoff contender, I'm just going to enjoy that awesome play.
    Someone's upset.

  8. #158

    Re: Red Sox Thread Version 5.0

    Quote Originally Posted by NYYDragoon
    Sure, with a little performance enhancement, right?
    That's your rebuttal to my post?

    Because we can go (and have gone) down this road before. Tossing stones from glass houses just makes you look... well, you know.

  9. #159

    Re: Red Sox Thread Version 5.0

    Quote Originally Posted by Nathan
    Someone's upset.
    Really?

    Because that's pretty much the opposite of what he said.

  10. #160

    Re: Red Sox Thread Version 5.0

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr Coffee
    Really?

    Because that's pretty much the opposite of what he said.
    His post was emotionally charged and he called Ortiz all sorts of names. You don't name-call players unless they upset you somehow.

    I don't see 0-4 Victor Martinez getting any vitriol thrown his way tonight.

  11. #161

    Re: Red Sox Thread Version 5.0

    Quote Originally Posted by Nathan
    His post was emotionally charged and he called Ortiz all sorts of names. You don't name-call players unless they upset you somehow.

    I don't see 0-4 Victor Martinez getting any vitriol thrown his way tonight.
    You don't think what he said about Ortiz was true in this instance?

    BTW, I like Victor. He says 'hi' to Swisher's grandparents every time he crosses the plate.

  12. #162

    Re: Red Sox Thread Version 5.0

    Quote Originally Posted by Nathan
    His post was emotionally charged and he called Ortiz all sorts of names. You don't name-call players unless they upset you somehow.

    I don't see 0-4 Victor Martinez getting any vitriol thrown his way tonight.
    Maybe you don't. We're very different people, Nathan. For instance, I don't go onto message boards for rival teams to start trouble. I come here because I enjoy talking about baseball with Yankee fans. I enjoyed the Ortiz play and laughed, and I mocked him with appropriate labels. I'm sorry that your team isn't in contention this year. Is that why you're upset?

  13. #163

    Re: Red Sox Thread Version 5.0

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr Coffee
    You don't think what he said about Ortiz was true in this instance?

    BTW, I like Victor. He says 'hi' to Swisher's grandparents every time he crosses the plate.

    Ortiz should have hustled for sure. He thought he had hit it out, but it was obviously close enough that he should have been running out of the box. I don't think he's an idiot, he was just wrong about how far he hit the ball.

    But yes, he should have hustled. Bad move not doing so.

  14. #164

    Re: Red Sox Thread Version 5.0

    Quote Originally Posted by I'm A Wenner!
    Maybe you don't. We're very different people, Nathan. For instance, I don't go onto message boards for rival teams to start trouble. I come here because I enjoy talking about baseball with Yankee fans. I enjoyed the Ortiz play and laughed, and I mocked him with appropriate labels. I'm sorry that your team isn't in contention this year. Is that why you're upset?
    Appopriate labels? What does being "fat" or an "idiot" have to do with him getting thrown out? Lazy I could almost buy, but I don't think he got thrown out because he didn't feel like running.

    About the contention thing, you may be right. But it's May.

  15. #165

    Re: Red Sox Thread Version 5.0

    Quote Originally Posted by Nathan
    Ortiz should have hustled for sure. He thought he had hit it out, but it was obviously close enough that he should have been running out of the box. I don't think he's an idiot, he was just wrong about how far he hit the ball.

    But yes, he should have hustled. Bad move not doing so.
    Ok, fair enough.

    See if it was me, and it was a Yankee that did that, I would call him an idiot.

    Like Wenner said, we're all different.

  16. #166

    Re: Red Sox Thread Version 5.0

    Quote Originally Posted by Nathan
    Appopriate labels? What does being "fat" or an "idiot" have to do with him getting thrown out? Lazy I could almost buy, but I don't think he got thrown out because he didn't feel like running.

    About the contention thing, you may be right. But it's May.
    Fat refers to his level of conditioning. Is it really that difficult to make a connection between his incredibly poor conditioning and his getting thrown out at second on what should have been an easy double?

    He's an idiot because he stood around rather than running on a ball that wasn't long enough to get out.

  17. #167

    Re: Red Sox Thread Version 5.0

    Quote Originally Posted by I'm A Wenner!
    Fat refers to his level of conditioning. Is it really that difficult to make a connection between his incredibly poor conditioning and his getting thrown out at second on what should have been an easy double?

    He's an idiot because he stood around rather than running on a ball that wasn't long enough to get out.
    Wait, is it poor conditioning or the fact that he "stood around"?

    I think you confused yourself. Regroup.

  18. #168

    Re: Red Sox Thread Version 5.0

    Quote Originally Posted by Nathan
    Wait, is it poor conditioning or the fact that he "stood around"?

    I think you confused yourself. Regroup.
    Sorry for confusing you; I'll try to use shorter words. I never said that he was thrown out because of only one reason. He was thrown out because:

    1) he stood at home plate showboating because
    2) he's an idiot and thought it was a home runs and
    3) he was too fat and slow to make it to second after not running right away.

    You see, given the ball he hit, it's almost inconceivable that he'd get thrown out at second. Because of the number of problems with Ortiz, he got himself thrown out.

  19. #169
    JavyVazquezIsGettingSick False1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    7,664

    Re: Red Sox Thread Version 5.0

    Quote Originally Posted by Nathan
    Wait, is it poor conditioning or the fact that he "stood around"?

    I think you confused yourself. Regroup.
    It's both, you silly.

  20. #170

    Re: Red Sox Thread Version 5.0

    Quote Originally Posted by I'm A Wenner!
    Sorry for confusing you; I'll try to use shorter words. I never said that he was thrown out because of only one reason. He was thrown out because:

    1) he stood at home plate showboating because
    2) he's an idiot and thought it was a home runs and
    3) he was too fat and slow to make it to second after not running right away.

    You see, given the ball he hit, it's almost inconceivable that he'd get thrown out at second. Because of the number of problems with Ortiz, he got himself thrown out.


    Give it a rest. If calling Ortiz an idiot for getting thrown out (which is what I should be doing, not you, considering that I'm a fan of the team he's on) makes you feel better, keep on keepin' on.

  21. #171

    Re: Red Sox Thread Version 5.0

    Quote Originally Posted by Nathan


    Give it a rest. If calling Ortiz an idiot for getting thrown out (which is what I should be doing, not you, considering that I'm a fan of the team he's on) makes you feel better, keep on keepin' on.
    I feel fine. My team is in contention.

    Don't misunderstand me. I made fun of Ortiz because he's a buffoon and a liar, and his failures amuse me. It doesn't go anywhere beyond that. Again, I can see why this would confuse you, since you're the kind of guy who goes onto rival teams' message boards to irritate people.

  22. #172

    Re: Red Sox Thread Version 5.0

    Quote Originally Posted by I'm A Wenner!
    I feel fine. My team is in contention.

    Don't misunderstand me. I made fun of Ortiz because he's a buffoon and a liar, and his failures amuse me.
    Everyone's in contention in May. Well, maybe not the Orioles.

    No, it's because he's a prominent player on a rival team. Even if he were a buffoon/liar, there are probably 10 more guys on the Red Sox or the Royals or the Dodgers or the Yankees or any other roster that would fit the same description. But you focus on Ortiz for other reasons.

  23. #173
    JavyVazquezIsGettingSick False1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    7,664

    Re: Red Sox Thread Version 5.0

    Quote Originally Posted by Nathan
    Everyone's in contention in May. Well, maybe not the Orioles.

    No, it's because he's a prominent player on a rival team. Even if he were a buffoon/liar, there are probably 10 more guys on the Red Sox or the Royals or the Dodgers or the Yankees or any other roster that would fit the same description. But you focus on Ortiz for other reasons.
    Well, the reason he's prominent anymore is because he's a buffoon/liar. It's not that 101 OPS+ he rocked last season, his outstanding defense or stellar baserunning that's pushing him into the limelight these days.

  24. #174

    Re: Red Sox Thread Version 5.0

    Quote Originally Posted by Nathan
    To what are you referring?
    Stop playing games. Or better yet, stop playing games so badly. The reference was obviously to your post out of the blue on Ortiz, which couldn't have been more obvious bait had you put it on a hook. Strike 1 on Nathan.

    And you know why Yankee fans will focus on Ortiz over Victor Martinez. There's a little history there with Ortiz that Martinez doesn't have. Yet you went with the "I'll ask them questions instead!" approach and tied yourself in knots. Strike 2.

    And, since you're not swift enough to realize when you're in a hole the best thing to do is stop digging, you persisted and I'm A Wenner totally clowned you. Strike 3, you're out.

    You were never good at this trolling thing, Nathan, but even given that, your skills are clearly slipping. You need to go away for a while, a long while preferably, and regroup.

  25. #175

    Re: Red Sox Thread Version 5.0

    If the mods won't ban obvious troll NateNate, can we at least stop his use of the smiley emoticon?
    " They turned Pete into a hornytoad!!!"
    PS- life in the "209" near Yosemite- I was on a road bike ride yesterday and encountered a ( large ) bear in the middle of the road

  26. #176

    Re: Red Sox Thread Version 5.0

    Quote Originally Posted by NYYDragoon
    NESN talking nonsense. Heidi Watney just said, "It seems like both teams [the Yankees and Red Sox] are getting to each others' closers a little more recently." Uhh, when did the Sox get to Mo this season?

    Also apparently Kubel's GS led to Rivera's first blown save since 2007 .
    Eerie...Heidi must be a bit of a seer...she's obviously not much of a reporter, though.
    "I'm sorry Smokey, you were over the line, that's a foul....mark it zero Dude, next frame"

  27. #177

    Re: Red Sox Thread Version 5.0

    Quote Originally Posted by Meecham4ever
    Eerie...Heidi must be a bit of a seer...she's obviously not much of a reporter, though.
    The mix of leftover sox pubes inside her rivals that of the fenway shower floor.

    Her contract must require her to date a player at all times.

  28. #178

    Re: Red Sox Thread Version 5.0

    Wow!

  29. #179

    Re: Red Sox Thread Version 5.0

    bostondirtdogs.com: 'Turning Point?'
    boston.com: 'Perfect Comeback'
    redsox.com: 'Papelbon Earns Redemption'

    Boston's big contract starting pitcher left the game "with an injury" after another completely ineffective start. Scutaro is horrible. Ortiz made a huge out after he adored his flyball single, the runs that made the difference came from a dropped fly ball and an inexplicably shallow outfield alignment, and Papelbon let three guys on and gave up a run before he was able to barely get through Marcus Thames, Juan Miranda and Randy Winn.

    I would not be encouraged if I were a Sox fan.


  30. #180
    time of my life... b-ball-lunachick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    34,868

    Re: Red Sox Thread Version 5.0

    Quote Originally Posted by brosiusbuddy
    bostondirtdogs.com: 'Turning Point?'
    boston.com: 'Perfect Comeback'
    redsox.com: 'Papelbon Earns Redemption'

    Boston's big contract starting pitcher left the game "with an injury" after another completely ineffective start. Scutaro is horrible. Ortiz made a huge out after he adored his flyball single, the runs that made the difference came from a dropped fly ball and an inexplicably shallow outfield alignment, and Papelbon let three guys on and gave up a run before he was able to barely get through Marcus Thames, Juan Miranda and Randy Winn.

    I would not be encouraged if I were a Sox fan.
    neither would I at this point...they have to sell papers I guess.

  31. #181
    time of my life... b-ball-lunachick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    34,868

    Re: Red Sox Thread Version 5.0

    Did anyone hear Kay talking about how Cervelli said he did not think Papelbon hit him on purpose on Monday. Not only the game situation but because Victor jumped up and said "i'm sorry - that wasn't on purpose". So, if he doesn't jump up and say that, and it's suspicious, it is on purpose? just seemed like an odd exchange..

  32. #182

    Re: Red Sox Thread Version 5.0

    Quote Originally Posted by brosiusbuddy
    bostondirtdogs.com: 'Turning Point?'
    boston.com: 'Perfect Comeback'
    redsox.com: 'Papelbon Earns Redemption'

    Boston's big contract starting pitcher left the game "with an injury" after another completely ineffective start. Scutaro is horrible. Ortiz made a huge out after he adored his flyball single, the runs that made the difference came from a dropped fly ball and an inexplicably shallow outfield alignment, and Papelbon let three guys on and gave up a run before he was able to barely get through Marcus Thames, Juan Miranda and Randy Winn.

    I would not be encouraged if I were a Sox fan.
    Yep, Red Sox barely won. Guess they should be mad.

  33. #183

    Re: Red Sox Thread Version 5.0

    Quote Originally Posted by False1
    Well, the reason he's prominent anymore is because he's a buffoon/liar. It's not that 101 OPS+ he rocked last season, his outstanding defense or stellar baserunning that's pushing him into the limelight these days.
    Not really. He's still considered a good hitter, which is the reason why his slump has been such big news. If he were Darnell McDonald with the same results, no one would care.

    However, May is becoming less and less of a SSS. His OPS in May is now 1.163.

  34. #184

    Re: Red Sox Thread Version 5.0

    Quote Originally Posted by Nathan
    Yep, Red Sox barely won. Guess they should be mad.
    We would have probably won if the Sox had only lost.

  35. #185

    Re: Red Sox Thread Version 5.0

    Quote Originally Posted by brosiusbuddy
    bostondirtdogs.com: 'Turning Point?'
    boston.com: 'Perfect Comeback'
    redsox.com: 'Papelbon Earns Redemption'

    Boston's big contract starting pitcher left the game "with an injury" after another completely ineffective start. Scutaro is horrible. Ortiz made a huge out after he adored his flyball single, the runs that made the difference came from a dropped fly ball and an inexplicably shallow outfield alignment, and Papelbon let three guys on and gave up a run before he was able to barely get through Marcus Thames, Juan Miranda and Randy Winn.

    I would not be encouraged if I were a Sox fan.
    Nathan, I didn't realize you were a writer for all those outlets.
    Stella said, "Daddy when you gonna put me in a song?"

    (Visit the companion site to NYYFans! It's more than meets the eye: The new Political Soapbox)

  36. #186
    time of my life... b-ball-lunachick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    34,868

    Re: Red Sox Thread Version 5.0

    Quote Originally Posted by Nathan
    Yep, Red Sox barely won. Guess they should be mad.
    this is why you are a troll...you don't even believe that post..you just want to bait people.

  37. #187
    NYYF Cy Young


    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Cambridge, MA
    Posts
    1,873

    Re: Red Sox Thread Version 5.0

    Quote Originally Posted by b-ball-lunachick
    Did anyone hear Kay talking about how Cervelli said he did not think Papelbon hit him on purpose on Monday. Not only the game situation but because Victor jumped up and said "i'm sorry - that wasn't on purpose". So, if he doesn't jump up and say that, and it's suspicious, it is on purpose? just seemed like an odd exchange..
    It is odd but I wouldn't read too much into it. Maybe VM (who strikes me as a pretty good guy) thought that, given how the Yanks have owned the Sox, it would be natural for Cervelli to assume that the Sox might be trying to fire up the team by hitting a batter.

  38. #188

    Re: Red Sox Thread Version 5.0

    Quote Originally Posted by b-ball-lunachick
    this is why you are a troll...you don't even believe that post..you just want to bait people.
    Yes, it was sarcasm. It has nothing to do with being a troll.

    Sure, the game wasn't 100% positive for the Red Sox, but the outcome was. Who can say with a straight face that the Red Sox shouldn't be happy about overcoming a 5-1 deficit against Joba and Rivera? Were you guys unhappy about beating Papelbon 2 days ago because you barely won? That post deserved sarcasm.

  39. #189
    NYYF HOF

    TommyK8's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Trumbull, CT
    Posts
    4,185

    Re: Red Sox Thread Version 5.0

    Quote Originally Posted by b-ball-lunachick
    this is why you are a troll...you don't even believe that post..you just want to bait people.
    I can't even imagine how crazy these threads would have been if Nathan had been around when the Red Sox really were a much better team.

  40. #190
    ptcnyyfan
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    Posts
    105

    Re: Red Sox Thread Version 5.0

    Quote Originally Posted by Nathan
    Yup, I obviously only come in here after Red Sox wins.

    Obviously.
    Yeah, obviously obnoxious, that would be you.

  41. #191
    Hello dum-dum... effdamets's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    Now in Section 419
    Posts
    13,811

    Re: Red Sox Thread Version 5.0

    Quote Originally Posted by Nathan
    Yes, it was sarcasm. It has nothing to do with being a troll.

    Sure, the game wasn't 100% positive for the Red Sox, but the outcome was. Who can say with a straight face that the Red Sox shouldn't be happy about overcoming a 5-1 deficit against Joba and Rivera? Were you guys unhappy about beating Papelbon 2 days ago because you barely won? That post deserved sarcasm.
    Holy sh*t.
    You can't compare the two victories.
    The Yankees won by hitting two home runs in the bottom of the 9th.
    The Sox won because a guy dropped a pop up.
    To seek the sacred river Alph, To walk the caves of ice
    To break my fast on honey dew, And drink the milk of paradise

  42. #192
    Mr. Know-It-All Casey at the Bat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Pasadena, CA
    Posts
    3,617

    Re: Red Sox Thread Version 5.0

    Quote Originally Posted by NerfBall55
    The mix of leftover sox pubes inside her rivals that of the fenway shower floor.

    Her contract must require her to date a player at all times.
    That's pretty damn gross, man.

  43. #193
    Better than you teknetic's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    18,875

    Re: Red Sox Thread Version 5.0

    @ Nathan including Mo as a goat. Anything to make you feel better about Papelbon, mirite?
    Tiger Woods:Sent: 01:28 PM 09/08/2009:
    Have you ever had a golden shower done to you

  44. #194

    Re: Red Sox Thread Version 5.0

    Quote Originally Posted by NerfBall55
    The mix of leftover sox pubes inside her rivals that of the fenway shower floor.

    Her contract must require her to date a player at all times.
    You're a weird dude.

  45. #195

    Re: Red Sox Thread Version 5.0

    Quote Originally Posted by Nathan
    Yes, it was sarcasm. It has nothing to do with being a troll.
    So you're admitting it?

    As they say, admitting your shortcomings is the first step toward fixing them...

  46. #196

    Re: Red Sox Thread Version 5.0

    Quote Originally Posted by effdamets
    Holy sh*t.
    You can't compare the two victories.
    The Yankees won by hitting two home runs in the bottom of the 9th.
    The Sox won because a guy dropped a pop up.
    They both were epic, sure to be replayed on "MLB Classics" long after we're all dead and gone.
    "I'm sorry Smokey, you were over the line, that's a foul....mark it zero Dude, next frame"

  47. #197

    Re: Red Sox Thread Version 5.0

    Quote Originally Posted by TommyK8
    I can't even imagine how crazy these threads would have been if Nathan had been around when the Red Sox really were a much better team.
    He'd have some worthwhile points to make, at least.

  48. #198

    Re: Red Sox Thread Version 5.0

    Quote Originally Posted by effdamets
    Holy sh*t.
    You can't compare the two victories.
    The Yankees won by hitting two home runs in the bottom of the 9th.
    The Sox won because a guy dropped a pop up.
    The six hits off Joba and Mo had nothing to do with it? I agree that Rivera's runs were unearned, but he still could have gotten out of it. He's the Best Ever.

  49. #199

    Re: Red Sox Thread Version 5.0

    BTW, isn't Drew also hurt? He had to leave the game.

  50. #200

    Re: Red Sox Thread Version 5.0

    Quote Originally Posted by Nathan
    Someone's upset.
    See, you just don't understand how people outside of your delusional, dumb fan base think because you're a parody of them. Last night's loss sucked but no more than if it had been to the Blue Jays since your team is about as relevant as they are when compared to a world series hopeful.

    And I love to breaking this to you, but the next couple years aren't looking any better for your sad team so you'd be better served stocking up on vaseline and making sure The At-bat™ is bookmarked and ready on your DVD player.

+ Reply to Thread

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts