+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 50 of 79

Thread: So the Red sox give an extra year to Tek and wouldnt with Pedro, Damon, Manny ?

  1. #1

    So the Red sox give an extra year to Tek and wouldnt with Pedro, Damon, Manny ?

    First of all to begin with they gave him a terrible 4 year deal which wasnt worth it. Now theyre going to 2 years after he was just the worst catcher in all of baseball last year ? But yet they were cheap with the best pitcher ever, one of the best hitters ever and a good CF?

    Not to mention they alos gaver Schilling a contract last year when he was clearly hurt. Now whats the difference between Schilling and Tek and Manny, Pedro and Damon? Hm I wonder ?

  2. #2
    NYYF Legend


    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    CT
    Posts
    55,327

    Re: So the Red sox give an extra year to Tek and wouldnt with Pedro, Damon, Manny ?

    Huh? Did they sign Varitek?

  3. #3

    Re: So the Red sox give an extra year to Tek and wouldnt with Pedro, Damon, Manny ?

    Quote Originally Posted by YankeePride1967
    Huh? Did they sign Varitek?
    They upped the offer to 2 years.

  4. #4
    NYYF Legend


    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    CT
    Posts
    55,327

    Re: So the Red sox give an extra year to Tek and wouldnt with Pedro, Damon, Manny ?

    Quote Originally Posted by sabermet prospectus
    They upped the offer to 2 years.
    Wow, how many dollars per?

  5. #5
    Nearly Killed A Man
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    NH
    Posts
    3,380

    Re: So the Red sox give an extra year to Tek and wouldnt with Pedro, Damon, Manny ?

    Do you just think of random stuff and post threads about it or is there a method to your madness?

  6. #6
    NYYF HOF

    TommyK8's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Trumbull, CT
    Posts
    4,185

    Re: So the Red sox give an extra year to Tek and wouldnt with Pedro, Damon, Manny ?

    Quote Originally Posted by sabermet prospectus
    First of all to begin with they gave him a terrible 4 year deal which wasnt worth it. Now theyre going to 2 years after he was just the worst catcher in all of baseball last year ? But yet they were cheap with the best pitcher ever, one of the best hitters ever and a good CF?

    Not to mention they alos gaver Schilling a contract last year when he was clearly hurt. Now whats the difference between Schilling and Tek and Manny, Pedro and Damon? Hm I wonder ?
    You mean the same Manny they gave an 8 year contract to with 2 team options, the same Pedro they gave a 7 year contract to plus exercised a team option for 2004 a year before they had to that was worth $17.5 million, and the same Johnny Damon they originally signed to a 4 year contract?

  7. #7

    Re: So the Red sox give an extra year to Tek and wouldnt with Pedro, Damon, Manny ?

    There's no dollars mentioned here:
    http://www.projo.com/redsox/content/...3.21a3385.html

    And with reports out yesterday that the Red Sox had offered Jason Varitek a deal with a dual option for a second guaranteed year, the team comes closer to filling that hole every day.
    Just a wild guess:
    - Varitek has to reach certain performance milestones for the option to vest. If he's benched or stinks it up, it's a 1-year deal
    - Probably we're not talking about much money here
    - Sox need a catcher badly, and won't trade Bucholz for Salty.

    On Damon, Cashman swooped in and played it brilliantly. Can't really fault Theo on Pedro - Mets got stuck with a pretty bad contract. The Manny thing has been talked to death elsewhere, so let's not talk about that here.

  8. #8

    Re: So the Red sox give an extra year to Tek and wouldnt with Pedro, Damon, Manny ?

    Quote Originally Posted by sabermet prospectus
    First of all to begin with they gave him a terrible 4 year deal which wasnt worth it. Now theyre going to 2 years after he was just the worst catcher in all of baseball last year ? But yet they were cheap with the best pitcher ever, one of the best hitters ever and a good CF?

    Not to mention they alos gaver Schilling a contract last year when he was clearly hurt. Now whats the difference between Schilling and Tek and Manny, Pedro and Damon? Hm I wonder ?
    I think they wouldn't sign Damon because Boston is widely known as a hairist city.
    "I'm sorry Smokey, you were over the line, that's a foul....mark it zero Dude, next frame"

  9. #9
    God Bless the Scooter NYYFAN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Posts
    24,517

    Re: So the Red sox give an extra year to Tek and wouldnt with Pedro, Damon, Manny ?

    I hope they keep Tek, it makes them a weaker offensive team...

    Palmer killed Billy Mays

  10. #10
    Please, call me YFiB Yankee Fan in Boston's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Too Close to Fenway
    Posts
    9,860

    Re: So the Red sox give an extra year to Tek and wouldnt with Pedro, Damon, Manny ?

    Quote Originally Posted by Meecham4ever
    I think they wouldn't sign Damon because Boston is widely known as a hairist city.
    Hmmmm... Manny too... you may be on to something
    "Trade a player a year too early rather than a year too late" -- Branch Rickey

  11. #11
    Give me the Zoppity mentalgidget's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Back in the Ocean State
    Posts
    2,085

    Re: So the Red sox give an extra year to Tek and wouldnt with Pedro, Damon, Manny ?

    Quote Originally Posted by sabermet prospectus
    First of all to begin with they gave him a terrible 4 year deal which wasnt worth it. Now theyre going to 2 years after he was just the worst catcher in all of baseball last year ? But yet they were cheap with the best pitcher ever, one of the best hitters ever and a good CF?

    Not to mention they alos gaver Schilling a contract last year when he was clearly hurt. Now whats the difference between Schilling and Tek and Manny, Pedro and Damon? Hm I wonder ?
    where to start?
    First, you chastise the Sox for giving Varitek a "terrible 4 year deal" yet, at the same time, you chastise them for NOT giving long term contracts to Pedro & Damon. which is it? Are they dumb for going long term with Varitek, or horrible humans for not going long term with Pedro & Damon?

    Pedro wanted 4 guaranteed years, the Sox didnt want to give hime 4, they were skiddish about giving him 3 as it was. Damon got 4 yrs guranteed. Varitek may be getting 2 years guaranteed... that's a huge difference, especially considering the $$ involved in each situation. I havent seen any concrete numbers written about this offer to Varitek but one can safely assume it's in the 5-7 million / yr range while Damon and Pedro each are (were, in Pedro's case) getting around 13 million / yr.
    They may sign Varitek for 1/2 the time and 1/4 the money and you think they made a major concession to Varitek and screwed Damon & Pedro?
    Ah, dammit! I want pancakes! God, do you people understand every language except English? Yo quiero pancakes. Donnez moi pancakes. Click click, bloody click pancakes!
    -- Stewie Griffin

  12. #12
    Twenty Eight in Twenty Ten nnysiny's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    7,009

    Re: So the Red sox give an extra year to Tek and wouldnt with Pedro, Damon, Manny ?

    Quote Originally Posted by sabermet prospectus
    First of all to begin with they gave him a terrible 4 year deal which wasnt worth it. Now theyre going to 2 years after he was just the worst catcher in all of baseball last year ? But yet they were cheap with the best pitcher ever, one of the best hitters ever and a good CF?

    Not to mention they alos gaver Schilling a contract last year when he was clearly hurt. Now whats the difference between Schilling and Tek and Manny, Pedro and Damon? Hm I wonder ?
    so wheres the part where they offered him 2 years?

  13. #13
    NYYF Legend


    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Coral Springs, Fl
    Posts
    5,140

    Re: So the Red sox give an extra year to Tek and wouldnt with Pedro, Damon, Manny ?

    Quote Originally Posted by sabermet prospectus
    First of all to begin with they gave him a terrible 4 year deal which wasnt worth it. Now theyre going to 2 years after he was just the worst catcher in all of baseball last year ? But yet they were cheap with the best pitcher ever, one of the best hitters ever and a good CF?

    Not to mention they alos gaver Schilling a contract last year when he was clearly hurt. Now whats the difference between Schilling and Tek and Manny, Pedro and Damon? Hm I wonder ?
    Schilling and Tek took/would take 1-2 year deals and the other guys all wanted longer contracts? Any other stupid and insulting questions?

  14. #14
    Devoted Member

    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Land of 10,000 Lakes
    Posts
    758

    Re: So the Red sox give an extra year to Tek and wouldnt with Pedro, Damon, Manny ?

    Quote Originally Posted by sabermet prospectus
    Now whats the difference between Schilling and Tek and Manny, Pedro and Damon? Hm I wonder ?
    Did you really play that card?

  15. #15

    Re: So the Red sox give an extra year to Tek and wouldnt with Pedro, Damon, Manny ?

    Quote Originally Posted by scooterfan
    There's no dollars mentioned here:
    http://www.projo.com/redsox/content/...3.21a3385.html
    ...
    "... a dual option for a second guaranteed year..."

    What exactly does that mean?

  16. #16
    NYYF Legend


    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    CT
    Posts
    55,327

    Re: So the Red sox give an extra year to Tek and wouldnt with Pedro, Damon, Manny ?

    Quote Originally Posted by Zippythepinhead
    "... a dual option for a second guaranteed year..."

    What exactly does that mean?
    Worded strange, but I guess it's one of those options that either both or either/or have to exercise for it to happen.

  17. #17
    Please, call me YFiB Yankee Fan in Boston's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Too Close to Fenway
    Posts
    9,860

    Re: So the Red sox give an extra year to Tek and wouldnt with Pedro, Damon, Manny ?

    Quote Originally Posted by Zippythepinhead
    "... a dual option for a second guaranteed year..."

    What exactly does that mean?
    Team and player option, I imagine. Either can opt-out
    "Trade a player a year too early rather than a year too late" -- Branch Rickey

  18. #18
    Twenty Eight in Twenty Ten nnysiny's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    7,009

    Re: So the Red sox give an extra year to Tek and wouldnt with Pedro, Damon, Manny ?

    Quote Originally Posted by Zippythepinhead
    "... a dual option for a second guaranteed year..."

    What exactly does that mean?
    usually known as a "mutual option"

  19. #19
    Released Outright
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Westchester-ish
    Posts
    18,236

    Re: So the Red sox give an extra year to Tek and wouldnt with Pedro, Damon, Manny ?

    Mutual options are so incredibly pointless.

  20. #20

    Re: So the Red sox give an extra year to Tek and wouldnt with Pedro, Damon, Manny ?

    Quote Originally Posted by eaganmafia
    Did you really play that card?
    I don't even understand what the "card" is?

    and to answer the question, how about the facts that it's late January and they could kind of use a catcher and we have no idea what the economics of the deal entail? Had any of those guys been up for a 2-year contract at low money, I'm sure the Sox would have jumped at it...

  21. #21
    Give me the Zoppity mentalgidget's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Back in the Ocean State
    Posts
    2,085

    Re: So the Red sox give an extra year to Tek and wouldnt with Pedro, Damon, Manny ?

    Quote Originally Posted by Zippythepinhead
    "... a dual option for a second guaranteed year..."

    What exactly does that mean?
    The only thing i can think is that it means the 2nd year becomes guaranteed if Varitek meets certain incentives (probably based on games played & ABs & probably very attainable); if he fails to meet those incentives, it becomes a club option.
    That would be my guess
    Ah, dammit! I want pancakes! God, do you people understand every language except English? Yo quiero pancakes. Donnez moi pancakes. Click click, bloody click pancakes!
    -- Stewie Griffin

  22. #22

    Re: So the Red sox give an extra year to Tek and wouldnt with Pedro, Damon, Manny ?

    Quote Originally Posted by YankeePride1967
    Worded strange, but I guess it's one of those options that either both or either/or have to exercise for it to happen.
    That's the thing, though -- that phrase could have a number of meanings -- contradictory meanings. Not just the dual option part, but also the "guarantee".

    Anyway, if there is a club option on the 2nd year, it's not really a concession, is it?

  23. #23
    NYYF Legend


    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    CT
    Posts
    55,327

    Re: So the Red sox give an extra year to Tek and wouldnt with Pedro, Damon, Manny ?

    Quote Originally Posted by Zippythepinhead
    That's the thing, though -- that phrase could have a number of meanings -- contradictory meanings. Not just the dual option part, but also the "guarantee".

    Anyway, if there is a club option on the 2nd year, it's not really a concession, is it?
    The only benefit there could be to Varitek is if the buyout is sizable, but I doubt it. Mostly, club options are to the benefits of the club.

  24. #24
    Devoted Member

    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Land of 10,000 Lakes
    Posts
    758

    Re: So the Red sox give an extra year to Tek and wouldnt with Pedro, Damon, Manny ?

    Quote Originally Posted by Zippythepinhead
    I don't even understand what the "card" is?

    and to answer the question, how about the facts that it's late January and they could kind of use a catcher and we have no idea what the economics of the deal entail? Had any of those guys been up for a 2-year contract at low money, I'm sure the Sox would have jumped at it...
    That the Sox offered deals to Tek & Schilling who are white. But didn't offer anything to Manny and Pedro and who are Latin and whatever the hell Damon is. Even though they're all completly different cases he grouped them all in the "Boston is a racist franchise" card.

  25. #25

    Re: So the Red sox give an extra year to Tek and wouldnt with Pedro, Damon, Manny ?

    Quote Originally Posted by sabermet prospectus
    Now whats the difference between Schilling and Tek and Manny, Pedro and Damon? Hm I wonder ?
    Hahahahahahaha.

    This forum should institute a waiting period for your new threads, where a mod has to give their approval for everyone to be subjected to these questions.

    1) I think giving Varitek two years is dumb.
    2) His situation is nothing like the other players you mentioned. Committing two years to a player at a low AAV means that if he continues to decline, the Sox can just cut him. It's a lot easier to eat 1/$5M than it is to eat a $13/14 owed to a player like Damon/Pedro.
    3) Would you care to clarify that question I quoted?

  26. #26

    Re: So the Red sox give an extra year to Tek and wouldnt with Pedro, Damon, Manny ?

    Quote Originally Posted by eaganmafia
    That the Sox offered deals to Tek & Schilling who are white. But didn't offer anything to Manny and Pedro and who are Latin and whatever the hell Damon is. Even though they're all completly different cases he grouped them all in the "Boston is a racist franchise" card.
    Isn't Damon part Asian? I guess that's what threw me off -- I don't think he's Hispanic, and the Sox seem to be OK with Asian players. And other Latin players.

    But other than that, and the lack of similarities between the contracts, it appears the point is spot on...

  27. #27

    Re: So the Red sox give an extra year to Tek and wouldnt with Pedro, Damon, Manny ?

    Quote Originally Posted by YankeePride1967
    The only benefit there could be to Varitek is if the buyout is sizable, but I doubt it. Mostly, club options are to the benefits of the club.
    Is there necessarily a buyout attached to a club option?

  28. #28
    Devoted Member

    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Land of 10,000 Lakes
    Posts
    758

    Re: So the Red sox give an extra year to Tek and wouldnt with Pedro, Damon, Manny ?

    Quote Originally Posted by Zippythepinhead
    Isn't Damon part Asian? I guess that's what threw me off -- I don't think he's Hispanic, and the Sox seem to be OK with Asian players. And other Latin players.

    But other than that, and the lack of similarities between the contracts, it appears the point is spot on...
    I though Damon was Native American, doesn't matter anyways this is a dumb-ass thread.

  29. #29
    NYYF Legend


    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    CT
    Posts
    55,327

    Re: So the Red sox give an extra year to Tek and wouldnt with Pedro, Damon, Manny ?

    Quote Originally Posted by Zippythepinhead
    Is there necessarily a buyout attached to a club option?
    Not automatically, but most do. I would imagine in Varitek's case if there is one, it isn't much more than half a million.

  30. #30
    In Memory of The Boss... MassNYYfan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    F'ington, CT
    Posts
    10,071

    Re: So the Red sox give an extra year to Tek and wouldnt with Pedro, Damon, Manny ?

    Quote Originally Posted by eaganmafia
    I though Damon was Native American, doesn't matter anyways this is a dumb-ass thread.
    What it is, it's not uber-white, so there.

    I hope this thread is being locked right now so I show up as being in after the lock.

    Geez.

    "Metallica. Screaming crowd. Jog to the mound. Game over." -C. Jennings

  31. #31
    NYYF Legend


    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Coral Springs, Fl
    Posts
    5,140

    Re: So the Red sox give an extra year to Tek and wouldnt with Pedro, Damon, Manny ?

    Quote Originally Posted by eaganmafia
    That the Sox offered deals to Tek & Schilling who are white. But didn't offer anything to Manny and Pedro and who are Latin and whatever the hell Damon is. Even though they're all completly different cases he grouped them all in the "Boston is a racist franchise" card.
    Of course, Manny was still under the team's control for two more years at which time he would have been 38. So, I guess the Sox are racist for not wanting to just tear those two years up and guarantee him more money till he was 40 or 41.

    As for Pedro, they were afraid he was going to fall apart and didn't want to go past two years. They were probably afraid of paying him 25 million for a year with 29 innings pitched and another year of 100 innings at a 5.61 ERA. Thank goodness for Pedro, the Mets aren't racist.

  32. #32

    Re: So the Red sox give an extra year to Tek and wouldnt with Pedro, Damon, Manny ?

    Quote Originally Posted by sabermet prospectus
    First of all to begin with they gave him a terrible 4 year deal which wasnt worth it. Now theyre going to 2 years after he was just the worst catcher in all of baseball last year ? But yet they were cheap with the best pitcher ever, one of the best hitters ever and a good CF?

    Not to mention they alos gaver Schilling a contract last year when he was clearly hurt. Now whats the difference between Schilling and Tek and Manny, Pedro and Damon? Hm I wonder ?
    Oe thing they ALL have in common...the Sux were/would be correct to
    let all of them walk away rather than meet their "number of years" demands.

    Varitek for two years? Bad move, Epstein.
    Get 'er done.
    "I'm sorry Smokey, you were over the line, that's a foul....mark it zero Dude, next frame"

  33. #33

    Re: So the Red sox give an extra year to Tek and wouldnt with Pedro, Damon, Manny ?

    Sabermet, don't let the haters get you down. Don't ever change, man.

  34. #34
    NYYF Legend


    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Coral Springs, Fl
    Posts
    5,140

    Re: So the Red sox give an extra year to Tek and wouldnt with Pedro, Damon, Manny ?

    Quote Originally Posted by Meecham4ever
    Oe thing they ALL have in common...the Sux were/would be correct to
    let all of them walk away rather than meet their "number of years" demands.

    Varitek for two years? Bad move, Epstein.
    Get 'er done.
    That second year better be under the club's control.

  35. #35

    Re: So the Red sox give an extra year to Tek and wouldnt with Pedro, Damon, Manny ?

    Dual Option means the option is able to be acted on by both sides, but that it does not have the same value.

    The Team Option will likely be 5-6-7 million
    The Player Option will likely be half of whatever the team option is.

  36. #36
    Give me the Zoppity mentalgidget's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Back in the Ocean State
    Posts
    2,085

    Re: So the Red sox give an extra year to Tek and wouldnt with Pedro, Damon, Manny ?

    Quote Originally Posted by gehrig38
    Dual Option means the option is able to be acted on by both sides, but that it does not have the same value.

    The Team Option will likely be 5-6-7 million
    The Player Option will likely be half of whatever the team option is.
    yeah, that was my 2nd guess
    Ah, dammit! I want pancakes! God, do you people understand every language except English? Yo quiero pancakes. Donnez moi pancakes. Click click, bloody click pancakes!
    -- Stewie Griffin

  37. #37
    NYYF Legend


    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Coral Springs, Fl
    Posts
    5,140

    Re: So the Red sox give an extra year to Tek and wouldnt with Pedro, Damon, Manny ?

    Quote Originally Posted by gehrig38
    Dual Option means the option is able to be acted on by both sides, but that it does not have the same value.

    The Team Option will likely be 5-6-7 million
    The Player Option will likely be half of whatever the team option is.
    OK. Thanks, that makes sense.

  38. #38

    Re: So the Red sox give an extra year to Tek and wouldnt with Pedro, Damon, Manny ?

    Foulke had that.

  39. #39

    Re: So the Red sox give an extra year to Tek and wouldnt with Pedro, Damon, Manny ?

    Pedro and Mannys original deals are irrelevant because they were still in their prime. But they werent willing to payback guys like Pedro or Damon but did with Varitek.

    Now personally I agree with not getting Pedro cause I dont beleive in paying guys back but why pay back a scrum like Tek but not a great pitcher like Pedro? Clearly Pedro in 04 was m uch better then Tek npw or even Tek in 04.

    I guarentee Tek ends up being the most revered guy from the title teams which makes sense in a city like Boston.

  40. #40
    Nearly Killed A Man
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    NH
    Posts
    3,380

    Re: So the Red sox give an extra year to Tek and wouldnt with Pedro, Damon, Manny ?

    Quote Originally Posted by sabermet prospectus
    Pedro and Mannys original deals are irrelevant because they were still in their prime. But they werent willing to payback guys like Pedro or Damon but did with Varitek.

    Now personally I agree with not getting Pedro cause I dont beleive in paying guys back but why pay back a scrum like Tek but not a great pitcher like Pedro? Clearly Pedro in 04 was m uch better then Tek npw or even Tek in 04.

    I guarentee Tek ends up being the most revered guy from the title teams which makes sense in a city like Boston.
    But they were willing to pay for Damon and they even offered more money than they should have for Pedro - the Mets just upped it.

    As for Manny, that doesn't even make any sense. But then again, neither does this thread.

  41. #41

    Re: So the Red sox give an extra year to Tek and wouldnt with Pedro, Damon, Manny ?

    http://www.weei.com/

    $5M guaranteed for next year, $5M team option/$3M player option for the year after, possibly plus incentives. And a deadline.

  42. #42
    NYYF Legend


    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Coral Springs, Fl
    Posts
    5,140

    Re: So the Red sox give an extra year to Tek and wouldnt with Pedro, Damon, Manny ?

    Quote Originally Posted by sabermet prospectus
    Pedro and Mannys original deals are irrelevant because they were still in their prime. But they werent willing to payback guys like Pedro or Damon but did with Varitek.

    Now personally I agree with not getting Pedro cause I dont beleive in paying guys back but why pay back a scrum like Tek but not a great pitcher like Pedro? Clearly Pedro in 04 was m uch better then Tek npw or even Tek in 04.

    I guarentee Tek ends up being the most revered guy from the title teams which makes sense in a city like Boston.
    You do understand we're talking about different money here, right?

    It would have taken 40 million to "pay back" Pedro. They offered Varitek 5 million with the chance for 5 more.

    As for the second point, unless David Ortiz murders somebody, I think I know who the "most revered" award will go to.

  43. #43

    Re: So the Red sox give an extra year to Tek and wouldnt with Pedro, Damon, Manny ?

    Responding to him is pointless. Sabermet is having a conversation with himself.

  44. #44
    appendix-free Melan-cynic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    19.6 miles from Yankee Stadium
    Posts
    9,205

    Re: So the Red sox give an extra year to Tek and wouldnt with Pedro, Damon, Manny ?

    Thought there was news to be had on this thread. Instead it's a poke at the Red Sox through implied racism toward departing FA's?

    FAIL
    "I see Jesus Montero as a potential once-in-a-generation force on offense."



  45. #45

    Re: So the Red sox give an extra year to Tek and wouldnt with Pedro, Damon, Manny ?

    Quote Originally Posted by Rice14
    You do understand we're talking about different money here, right?

    It would have taken 40 million to "pay back" Pedro. They offered Varitek 5 million with the chance for 5 more.

    As for the second point, unless David Ortiz murders somebody, I think I know who the "most revered" award will go to.
    Thats only because the sox have Ortiz at a cheap price. Once he becomes a free agent and the sox dont pay him the FO will trash him to high heaven, the fans will eat it up like the sheep they are and then Tek will be numero uno.

  46. #46
    Devoted Member

    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Land of 10,000 Lakes
    Posts
    758

    Re: So the Red sox give an extra year to Tek and wouldnt with Pedro, Damon, Manny ?

    Sab just quit....

  47. #47
    One Game At A Time S2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    5,069

    Re: So the Red sox give an extra year to Tek and wouldnt with Pedro, Damon, Manny ?

    Guaranteed money to past their primes aging players aside...
    00000000100000000000100000000001
    It is what it is but it ain't what you think
    I say we stomp him! Then we tattoo him! Then we hang him! And then we kill him!
    I say we let him go.

  48. #48
    JavyVazquezIsGettingSick False1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    7,664

    Re: So the Red sox give an extra year to Tek and wouldnt with Pedro, Damon, Manny ?

    Quote Originally Posted by blumj
    http://www.weei.com/

    $5M guaranteed for next year, $5M team option/$3M player option for the year after, possibly plus incentives. And a deadline.
    Nice job by Boras convincing him to decline arb, and probably a 1/$10MM deal.

  49. #49

    Re: So the Red sox give an extra year to Tek and wouldnt with Pedro, Damon, Manny ?

    Quote Originally Posted by False1
    Nice job by Boras convincing him to decline arb, and probably a 1/$10MM deal.
    It wouldn't even shock me if Boras convinces him to turn this down, too.

  50. #50
    Jim and Pam are movie geniuses mBiferi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Caracas
    Posts
    427

    Re: So the Red sox give an extra year to Tek and wouldnt with Pedro, Damon, Manny ?

    Quote Originally Posted by S2
    Guaranteed money to past their primes aging players aside...
    Cuz I am... the Rain King!

+ Reply to Thread

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts