+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 41 of 41

Thread: AFC Playoff Watch: 2006

  1. #1
    Looking ahead to 2009... RIyankee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    43 miles west of Gillette Stadium
    Posts
    7,311

    AFC Playoff Watch: 2006

    AFC East:
    Team Rec/AFC/DIV ~ ~ ~ Remaining Games
    NE 10-4/ 6-4/ 4-2 ~ ~ ~ @JAX, @TEN
    NYJ 8-6/ 5-5/ 3-2 ~ ~ ~ @MIA, OAK

    AFC North:
    Team Rec/AFC/DIV ~ ~ ~ Remaining Games
    BAL 11-3/ 8-2/ 4-1 ~ ~ ~ @PIT, BUF
    CIN 8-6/ 6-4/ 4-1 ~ ~ ~ @DEN, PIT

    AFC South:
    Team Rec/AFC/DIV ~ ~ ~ Remaining Games
    IND 11-3/ 8-2/ 3-2 ~ ~ ~ @HOU, MIA ***Clinched AFC South***
    JAX 8-6/ 5-5/ 2-4 ~ ~ ~ NE, @KC

    AFC West:
    Team Rec/AFC/DIV ~ ~ ~ Remaining Games
    SD 12-2/ 10-2/ 5-1 ~ ~ ~ @SEA, ARZ
    DEN 8-6/ 7-4/ 3-3 ~ ~ ~ CIN, SF

    The 7-7 group:
    Team Rec/AFC/DIV ~ ~ ~ Remaining Games
    BUF 7-7/ 5-5/ 3-3 ~ ~ ~ TEN, @BAL
    PIT 7-7/ 4-6/ 2-2 ~ ~ ~ BAL, @CIN
    TEN 7-7/ 4-6/ 4-2 ~ ~ ~ @BUF, NE
    KC 7-7/ 3-7/ 3-2 ~ ~ ~ @OAK, JAX
    Last edited by RIyankee; 12-19-06 at 06:38 AM.

  2. #2
    It's all relative gdn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    your face
    Posts
    23,107

    Re: AFC Playoff Watch: 2006

    Oo, the Steelers have a tough road ahead

  3. #3
    NYYF Triple Crown


    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Rochester, New York
    Posts
    2,515

    Re: AFC Playoff Watch: 2006

    Quote Originally Posted by gdn
    Oo, the Steelers have a tough road ahead
    I agree. Hopefully, though, they can get payback this week at home against Baltimore.

  4. #4
    NYYF Triple Crown


    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    westie
    Posts
    2,955

    Re: AFC Playoff Watch: 2006

    Quote Originally Posted by RIyankee

    BAL 10-4/ 8-2/ 4-1 ~ ~ ~ @PIT, BUF
    Baltimore is 11-3.
    Burns: I wonder if this Homer Nixon is any relation?
    Smithers: Unlikely, sir. They spell and pronounce their names differently.

  5. #5
    Looking ahead to 2009... RIyankee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    43 miles west of Gillette Stadium
    Posts
    7,311

    Re: AFC Playoff Watch: 2006

    Quote Originally Posted by JWHIII
    Baltimore is 11-3.
    The evils of copy and paste.

    Thanks!

  6. #6
    Ito Ang Beer! BroadwayBomber55's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    SF-Oak-SJ Bay Area, California
    Posts
    49,901

    Re: AFC Playoff Watch: 2006

    The AFC is a heavy logjam again.
    "Don't Give Up...Don't Ever Give Up." - Jimmy Valvano

    One must know pain to be a hero.



  7. #7
    NYYF Triple Crown


    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Rhode Island
    Posts
    3,170

    Re: AFC Playoff Watch: 2006

    Quote Originally Posted by gdn
    Oo, the Steelers have a tough road ahead
    It's to their credit they still have a chance.

  8. #8
    It's all relative gdn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    your face
    Posts
    23,107

    Re: AFC Playoff Watch: 2006

    Quote Originally Posted by Pepper03
    It's to their credit they still have a chance.
    And it's entirely their fault that they haven't secured a spot yet... those losses to Oakland and Atlanta sure are coming to bite them in the rear.

  9. #9
    Looking ahead to 2009... RIyankee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    43 miles west of Gillette Stadium
    Posts
    7,311

    Re: AFC Playoff Watch: 2006

    Quote Originally Posted by Pepper03
    It's to their credit they still have a chance.
    It's to their discredit that they lost to a team like Oakland, that put them in this "creditable" position.

  10. #10
    It's all relative gdn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    your face
    Posts
    23,107

    Re: AFC Playoff Watch: 2006

    Quote Originally Posted by RIyankee
    It's to their discredit that they lost to a team like Oakland, that put them in this "creditable" position.
    Hey! Stop copying me

  11. #11
    NYYF MVP

    gamesix1977's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Mechanicsburg, PA
    Posts
    1,141

    Re: AFC Playoff Watch: 2006

    Jets still in it too!
    It was then I knew I'd had enough,
    Burned my credit card for fuel
    Headed out to where the pavement turns to sand

  12. #12
    NYYF Triple Crown


    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Rhode Island
    Posts
    3,170

    Re: AFC Playoff Watch: 2006

    Quote Originally Posted by gdn
    And it's entirely their fault that they haven't secured a spot yet... those losses to Oakland and Atlanta sure are coming to bite them in the rear.
    Yes but a team with lesser character could have thrown in the towel long ago. That's what I meant.

  13. #13
    It's all relative gdn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    your face
    Posts
    23,107

    Re: AFC Playoff Watch: 2006

    Quote Originally Posted by Pepper03
    Yes but a team with lesser character could have thrown in the towel long ago. That's what I meant.
    I understand. I truly believe Big Ben ruined their chances this year by coming back too early.

  14. #14
    NYYF Triple Crown


    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Rhode Island
    Posts
    3,170

    Re: AFC Playoff Watch: 2006

    Quote Originally Posted by gdn
    I understand. I truly believe Big Ben ruined their chances this year by coming back too early.
    I think you may be right.

  15. #15
    Looking ahead to 2009... RIyankee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    43 miles west of Gillette Stadium
    Posts
    7,311

    Re: AFC Playoff Watch: 2006

    Quote Originally Posted by gdn
    I understand. I truly believe Big Ben ruined their chances this year by coming back too early.
    Blame Cowher.

    My theory is that Batch did too well vs Miami and Cowher didn't want a QB controversy.

    JMHO

  16. #16
    It's all relative gdn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    your face
    Posts
    23,107

    Re: AFC Playoff Watch: 2006

    Quote Originally Posted by RIyankee
    Blame Cowher.

    My theory is that Batch did too well vs Miami and Cowher didn't want a QB controversy.

    JMHO
    That's certainly possible too.

  17. #17
    One for the thumb. Soriambi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    22,077

    Re: AFC Playoff Watch: 2006

    As I figure it, these are the ways for the Jets to get into the playoffs without having to worry about any tie-breakers:

    In all of them, the Jets have to win both games.

    -If the NYJ win both games and NE loses both, they get in thanks to the tie-breaker as the division champ. That is unlikely.

    As for Wild Card scenarios, the Jets get in as at least a 6 seed (some could be 5th seed with tie-breakers, perhaps) if:

    -IND beats CIN tonight, and NE beats JAX next week OR
    -IND beats CIN tonight, and KC beats JAX in two weeks OR
    -CIN beats DEN next week and NE beats JAX next week OR
    -CIN beats DEN next week and KC beats JAX in two weeks OR
    -SF beats DEN in two weeks and NE beats JAX next week OR
    -SF beats DEN in two weeks and KC beats JAX in two weeks
    -DEN and PIT beat CIN and NE beats JAX next week OR
    -DEN and PIT beat CIN and KC beats JAX in two weeks.

    The Jets would get in as the 5 seed and the only 10-6 Wild Card if:

    -IND beats CIN tonight, CIN beats DEN next week, PIT beats CIN in two weeks, and either NE or KC beat JAX OR
    -CIN loses two of its three games to IND, DEN, and PIT (this could include a DEN win), DEN loses to SF in two weeks, and NE or KC beat JAX.

    So there are still many extremely realistic ways that the Jets can get in without having to worry about tie-breakers. I'm not figuring out tie-breakers now (when they would and wouldn't get in if certain teams finish 10-6, or if a ton of teams are at 9-7, etc.) because that would just give me a bigger headache than that gave me.
    "My point is you can't compare things with statistics." -Joe Morgan

    "I've always felt that starting pitching is the most important part of the rotation." -Joe Morgan


    Kevin: New York Squeaks

  18. #18
    NYYF Triple Crown


    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    westie
    Posts
    2,955

    Re: AFC Playoff Watch: 2006

    Jets and Cincy will get in.
    Burns: I wonder if this Homer Nixon is any relation?
    Smithers: Unlikely, sir. They spell and pronounce their names differently.

  19. #19
    CALL UP MONTERO!!!! dabomb2045's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Poughkeepsie, NY
    Posts
    31,824

    Re: AFC Playoff Watch: 2006

    It all comes down to next week for the Jets. If we beat Miami....we are getting in. Oakland sucks and they have already mailed in their season. I dont them giving us any problems in that last game. We really need the Colts to win tonight. A Bengals win will make it much harder for us to get in.

    Jets will finish 10-6. Assuming Cincy loses tonight, the winner of the Cincy/Denver game next week will get the other spot. If Denver wins, they play SF the last game of the year and will win rather easily. If Cincy wins, I dont see them losing at home to Pittsburgh with a playoff spot on the line either. I see Jacksonville finishing 9-7.

    Jesus Montero since June 1 (286 at-bats):
    .325/.386/.605/.991
    July 1 (182 at-bats):
    .348/.417/.658/1.075

  20. #20
    One for the thumb. Soriambi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    22,077

    Re: AFC Playoff Watch: 2006

    Quote Originally Posted by dabomb2045
    It all comes down to next week for the Jets. If we beat Miami....we are getting in. Oakland sucks and they have already mailed in their season. I dont them giving us any problems in that last game. We really need the Colts to win tonight. A Bengals win will make it much harder for us to get in.

    Jets will finish 10-6. Assuming Cincy loses tonight, the winner of the Cincy/Denver game next week will get the other spot. If Denver wins, they play SF the last game of the year and will win rather easily. If Cincy wins, I dont see them losing at home to Pittsburgh with a playoff spot on the line either. I see Jacksonville finishing 9-7.
    Oh, I'm not writing Oakland off yet against us. I've seen it too many times.
    "My point is you can't compare things with statistics." -Joe Morgan

    "I've always felt that starting pitching is the most important part of the rotation." -Joe Morgan


    Kevin: New York Squeaks

  21. #21

    Re: AFC Playoff Watch: 2006

    My guess right now is Jets and Cincy for the WC.

  22. #22

    Re: AFC Playoff Watch: 2006

    Nobody circles the wagons like the Buffalo Bills. Very slim shot, but it says a lot about the team after starting 2-5. They have only lost 2 games by more than 8 points.


    Buffalo Bills 2010 "Oh"-Line

  23. #23
    Looking ahead to 2009... RIyankee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    43 miles west of Gillette Stadium
    Posts
    7,311

    Re: AFC Playoff Watch: 2006

    Updated the OP.

    BTW, Great posts on this and in the NFC thread. If anyone wants to contribute any additional info or corrections, please do. That's what these playoff threads are about.

  24. #24
    CALL UP MONTERO!!!! dabomb2045's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Poughkeepsie, NY
    Posts
    31,824

    Re: AFC Playoff Watch: 2006

    Quote Originally Posted by Soriambi
    Oh, I'm not writing Oakland off yet against us. I've seen it too many times.
    If we lost to a 2-13 Oakland team, a team that has mailed in their season weeks ago....at home with a playoff spot on the line....it may be the worst loss in the history of the franchise. And thats saying alot.

    Jesus Montero since June 1 (286 at-bats):
    .325/.386/.605/.991
    July 1 (182 at-bats):
    .348/.417/.658/1.075

  25. #25
    Looking ahead to 2009... RIyankee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    43 miles west of Gillette Stadium
    Posts
    7,311

    Re: AFC Playoff Watch: 2006

    Quote Originally Posted by dabomb2045
    If we lost to a 2-13 Oakland team, a team that has mailed in their season weeks ago....at home with a playoff spot on the line....it may be the worst loss in the history of the franchise. And thats saying alot.
    One thing about the Raiders: they have a top 10 secondary. As for the rest, meh.

  26. #26
    Ito Ang Beer! BroadwayBomber55's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    SF-Oak-SJ Bay Area, California
    Posts
    49,901

    Re: AFC Playoff Watch: 2006

    My take on the AFC playoffs and who should get in...

    Denver Broncos - Solid defense, not enough offense. Also, they usually start well early, but fade in the second half. No playoffs for them.

    Cincinnati Bengals - Problems on both sides of the ball and off the field distractions. But I say if Carson Palmer is banged up, that means Rudi Johnson has to carry the Bengals into the playoffs. I say the Bengals get in.

    Jacksonville Jaguars - The Jags can run the ball. They play well at home. On the road?! No. Very inconsistent. Two tough games for them, not easy for the Jags to win both of them. No playoffs for them.

    New York Jets - Easy schedule, Eric Mangini brought disclipine to the Jets. A win against the Miami Dolphins should be enough. Playoffs for the Jets.

    Buffalo Bills - If J.P. Losman plays perfect ball against the Titans and Ravens, they can get in. But it's highly unlikely. No playoffs for them.

    Tennessee Titans - Vince Young is another feel good story. He should be rookie of the year. But if the Titans defense can't stop anyone, no playoffs for them.

    Pittsburgh Steelers - Very tough road ahead for them. They need to be at 9-7 to make the playoffs since they have don't have a good conference record.

    Kansas City Chiefs - Second easiest schedule of the remaining AFC teams. But they have no WR. Their offensive line is old and banged up and they have a bad conference record. No playoffs for them.

    Miami Dolphins - They need a lot of help. The slow start killed them. If they started Joey Harrington earlier, who knows what could've happen. No playoffs for them.

    So, I say the Jets and Bengals get in from the AFC.
    "Don't Give Up...Don't Ever Give Up." - Jimmy Valvano

    One must know pain to be a hero.



  27. #27
    One for the thumb. Soriambi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    22,077

    Re: AFC Playoff Watch: 2006

    I've been looking at the tie-breaking rules, and this is how I think it would go if teams are tied:

    If the Wild Card tie is at 10-6, the most teams that could be at 10-6 is three. They would be the Jets, the Jaguars, and the Bengals or the Broncos.

    If it's the Jets, Jags, and Broncos, the Jags and Broncos would advance. (First, you check whether any of the teams went 2-0 or 0-2 against the other two. None did. Second, you look at their conference winning percentage. They would all need to win the rest of their games to be 10-6, so if that happened, the Broncos would be 8-4 in the Conference, and the Jets and Jags would both be 7-5. Denver advances. Then, by rule, you revert back to step one to break the new tie (Jags and Jets) and step one is head to head, if applicable. It is applicable, and the Jags won, so the Jags would advance.

    If it's Jets, Jags, and Bengals, the exact same thing would happen and the Bengals and Jags would advance. Bengals would be 8-4 in the conference while the other two teams would be 7-5, and the Jags would get the tie-breaker over the Jets. Therefore, the only way the Jets can get into the playoffs is by winning their last two games and having two of the other three teams lose at least once (one automatically loses next week since Cinci is playing Denver.)

    So, as a Jet fan, I think that I'm rooting for New England to beat Jacksonville and Cincinnati to beat Denver, since I think Pittsburgh has a better chance of beating Cinci in Week 17 than San Fran does of being Denver.

    I'm not figuring out all of the possible 9-7 scenarios.

    The best possible scenario, even though I'm rooting against it this week:

    Jets win out, NE loses to JAX and TEN, JAX wins out, DEN wins out. Four teams end up at 10-6. I believe, if I calculate right, that the Jets would then get the division and the Pats would be the odd team out and miss the playoffs. One can dream.
    "My point is you can't compare things with statistics." -Joe Morgan

    "I've always felt that starting pitching is the most important part of the rotation." -Joe Morgan


    Kevin: New York Squeaks

  28. #28

    Re: AFC Playoff Watch: 2006

    As long as NE beats JAX, the CIN/DEN outcome doesn't matter. Unless of course you're talking about seeding, then I'm not sure what the outcome would mean.

  29. #29
    One for the thumb. Soriambi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    22,077

    Re: AFC Playoff Watch: 2006

    Quote Originally Posted by AMYanks
    As long as NE beats JAX, the CIN/DEN outcome doesn't matter. Unless of course you're talking about seeding, then I'm not sure what the outcome would mean.
    Yeah, I guess we'll know by CIN/DEN game time whether that matters. I forgot CIN vs. DEN was a late game. Still, it would give the Jets the best chance at the 5 seed if CIN won, since if CIN beat DEN and lost to PIT (and NE beat JAX), the Jets would be the only team at 10-6.
    "My point is you can't compare things with statistics." -Joe Morgan

    "I've always felt that starting pitching is the most important part of the rotation." -Joe Morgan


    Kevin: New York Squeaks

  30. #30
    CALL UP MONTERO!!!! dabomb2045's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Poughkeepsie, NY
    Posts
    31,824

    Re: AFC Playoff Watch: 2006

    If the rumors about Palmer's injury are true....the Bengals are done. Jets and Broncos get in.

    Jesus Montero since June 1 (286 at-bats):
    .325/.386/.605/.991
    July 1 (182 at-bats):
    .348/.417/.658/1.075

  31. #31
    One for the thumb. Soriambi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    22,077

    Re: AFC Playoff Watch: 2006

    Quote Originally Posted by dabomb2045
    If the rumors about Palmer's injury are true....the Bengals are done. Jets and Broncos get in.
    Well, it makes it less likely that they win, but I think they're good enough to win two games without him if some things go right.
    "My point is you can't compare things with statistics." -Joe Morgan

    "I've always felt that starting pitching is the most important part of the rotation." -Joe Morgan


    Kevin: New York Squeaks

  32. #32
    CALL UP MONTERO!!!! dabomb2045's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Poughkeepsie, NY
    Posts
    31,824

    Re: AFC Playoff Watch: 2006

    Quote Originally Posted by Soriambi
    Well, it makes it less likely that they win, but I think they're good enough to win two games without him if some things go right.
    Do you really see them winning at Mile High with Anthony Wright as their QB?

    Jesus Montero since June 1 (286 at-bats):
    .325/.386/.605/.991
    July 1 (182 at-bats):
    .348/.417/.658/1.075

  33. #33
    One for the thumb. Soriambi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    22,077

    Re: AFC Playoff Watch: 2006

    Quote Originally Posted by dabomb2045
    Do you really see them winning at Mile High with Anthony Wright as their QB?
    I think they could. It's probably more likely that the Broncos would win, but I think the Bengals would have an excellent chance. The NFL is so crazy that I wouldn't be surprised by a team like the Bengals winning anywhere with any NFL QB. If Houston can beat Jacksonville twice and SF can beat Seattle twice and teams like the Lions can barely lose to the Pats and teams like the Raiders can come within 7 points of beating SD, KC, and Denver, Cinci can certainly beat Denver in less than ideal circumstances without much of a stretch. If I had to pick, I'd pick Denver, but it's up in the air.
    "My point is you can't compare things with statistics." -Joe Morgan

    "I've always felt that starting pitching is the most important part of the rotation." -Joe Morgan


    Kevin: New York Squeaks

  34. #34
    NYYF Legend

    #1PaFan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2000
    Location
    PA
    Posts
    30,723

    Re: AFC Playoff Watch: 2006

    Quote Originally Posted by Soriambi
    I think they could. It's probably more likely that the Broncos would win, but I think the Bengals would have an excellent chance. The NFL is so crazy that I wouldn't be surprised by a team like the Bengals winning anywhere with any NFL QB. If Houston can beat Jacksonville twice and SF can beat Seattle twice and teams like the Lions can barely lose to the Pats and teams like the Raiders can come within 7 points of beating SD, KC, and Denver, Cinci can certainly beat Denver in less than ideal circumstances without much of a stretch. If I had to pick, I'd pick Denver, but it's up in the air.
    I'd go with Denver, too. Just because of their D. Their O is coming around, I think, too. They could be tough down the stretch....
    ....

  35. #35

    Re: AFC Playoff Watch: 2006

    I really hope Baltimore somehow gets a bye over Indianapolis, but unfortunately, Indy plays @ HOU and vs MIA, while Baltimore plays @ PIT and vs BUF. If the Jets make the playoffs, the last thing I want is for them to have to go into Baltimore in the first round. Teams like Baltimore are the worst matchup for us, I think they, like Jacksonville, would manhandle us. We're not ready to face those big, physical teams.

    I know it sounds crazy, but I'd rather the Jets face Indy or NE in the first round. Obviously not easy draws, but I think we have a chance against either of those teams, while Baltimore would annihilate us. Plus, you can bet your life the Saturday night primetime game would be Mangini vs Belichick. And me, personally, I love Saturday night playoff games more than anything.

  36. #36
    Looking ahead to 2009... RIyankee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    43 miles west of Gillette Stadium
    Posts
    7,311

    Re: AFC Playoff Watch: 2006

    The Pats clinch a playoff berth if the Cincy/Denver game ends in a tie.

  37. #37
    One Game At A Time S2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    5,069

    Re: AFC Playoff Watch: 2006

    Looking at the schedules, I think Denver and the Jets get in, setting up a Pats-Broncos, Jets-Ravens first round.
    00000000100000000000100000000001
    It is what it is but it ain't what you think
    I say we stomp him! Then we tattoo him! Then we hang him! And then we kill him!
    I say we let him go.

  38. #38
    NYYF Triple Crown


    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    westie
    Posts
    2,955

    Re: AFC Playoff Watch: 2006

    Quote Originally Posted by S2
    Looking at the schedules, I think Denver and the Jets get in, setting up a Pats-Broncos, Jets-Ravens first round.
    I like the Pats chances against Denver with a rookie QB going, but I'd rather see the Jets on wildcard weekend.
    Burns: I wonder if this Homer Nixon is any relation?
    Smithers: Unlikely, sir. They spell and pronounce their names differently.

  39. #39
    NYYF Triple Crown


    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Rhode Island
    Posts
    3,170

    Re: AFC Playoff Watch: 2006

    Quote Originally Posted by JWHIII
    I like the Pats chances against Denver with a rookie QB going, but I'd rather see the Jets on wildcard weekend.
    I don't like the Pats chances against the Broncos no matter who the QB is.

  40. #40
    Looking ahead to 2009... RIyankee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    43 miles west of Gillette Stadium
    Posts
    7,311

    Re: AFC Playoff Watch: 2006

    Quote Originally Posted by JWHIII
    I like the Pats chances against Denver with a rookie QB going, but I'd rather see the Jets on wildcard weekend.
    The thing about Plummer that bugged the Pats was his ability to throw deep outside of the pocket. Cutler strikes me as more of a pocket passer, thus easier to defend against.

    JMHO

  41. #41
    NYYF Triple Crown


    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    westie
    Posts
    2,955

    Re: AFC Playoff Watch: 2006

    Quote Originally Posted by Pepper03
    I don't like the Pats chances against the Broncos no matter who the QB is.
    I should have said I like their chances better. If the Pats never played Denver again that would be fine with me.
    Burns: I wonder if this Homer Nixon is any relation?
    Smithers: Unlikely, sir. They spell and pronounce their names differently.

+ Reply to Thread

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts