Ansky39
04-25-00, 11:50 AM
Once again mr keegan we see eye to eye...
I’ve gone on record at least 2,348 times in the past that griff is overrated and that bonds is the real preeminent player in this game... I posted dozens of times that bonds, NOT griff was the greatest position player of the 90's... I crunch the numbers, discuss the facts and all I get is,“ansky you’re out of your mind...” the players disagreed w/ me, the media obviously disagrees,and most fans I’ve encountered wouldn’t even entertain the thought...
well at least one man,agrees w/ ole ansky... my favorite writer on my favorite daily sports, uh newspaper, Tom Keegan
from the Post displayed the numbers from the 90's in a table, (unavailable online) to this article,(http://www.nypost.com/04232000/sports/28748.htm) Sunday and entitled it: You make the call... Well once again I’ll list the numbers and allow everyone to see what most pencil necked, thin skinned, griffey hyping media clones hide...
Games:
Bonds 1,444
Griff 1,408
HR’s:
Bonds 361
Griff 382
RBI’s:
Bonds 1,076
Griff 1,091
2b’s:
Bonds 299
Griff 297
3b’s:
Bonds 42
Griff 30
SB’s:
Bonds 343
Griff 141
BB’s:
Bonds 1,146
Griff 703
In the article he noted:
“BARRY BONDS: He has spent much of his career without great hitters batting in front of him,
which means he doesn't see as many fastballs as hitters constantly coming up with men on base,
and behind him, which results in him getting pitched around so routinely. Still, he manages to
produce great numbers. A much better base-stealer than Griffey and an even tougher out. ”
you make the call...
I’ve gone on record at least 2,348 times in the past that griff is overrated and that bonds is the real preeminent player in this game... I posted dozens of times that bonds, NOT griff was the greatest position player of the 90's... I crunch the numbers, discuss the facts and all I get is,“ansky you’re out of your mind...” the players disagreed w/ me, the media obviously disagrees,and most fans I’ve encountered wouldn’t even entertain the thought...
well at least one man,agrees w/ ole ansky... my favorite writer on my favorite daily sports, uh newspaper, Tom Keegan
from the Post displayed the numbers from the 90's in a table, (unavailable online) to this article,(http://www.nypost.com/04232000/sports/28748.htm) Sunday and entitled it: You make the call... Well once again I’ll list the numbers and allow everyone to see what most pencil necked, thin skinned, griffey hyping media clones hide...
Games:
Bonds 1,444
Griff 1,408
HR’s:
Bonds 361
Griff 382
RBI’s:
Bonds 1,076
Griff 1,091
2b’s:
Bonds 299
Griff 297
3b’s:
Bonds 42
Griff 30
SB’s:
Bonds 343
Griff 141
BB’s:
Bonds 1,146
Griff 703
In the article he noted:
“BARRY BONDS: He has spent much of his career without great hitters batting in front of him,
which means he doesn't see as many fastballs as hitters constantly coming up with men on base,
and behind him, which results in him getting pitched around so routinely. Still, he manages to
produce great numbers. A much better base-stealer than Griffey and an even tougher out. ”
you make the call...